Latest [Dec 29, 2024] Realistic Verified ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Dumps
Pass PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Exam Updated 125 Questions
PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam is designed to test the knowledge and skills of individuals in the implementation of an ISMS based on the ISO/IEC 27001 standard. ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam covers various topics such as the planning, implementation, monitoring, and review of an ISMS. It also covers the risk management process, security controls, and the legal and regulatory requirements that organizations need to comply with.
NEW QUESTION # 51
Scenario 8: SunDee is an American biopharmaceutical company, headquartered in California, the US. It specializes in developing novel human therapeutics, with a focus on cardiovascular diseases, oncology, bone health, and inflammation. The company has had an information security management system (ISMS) based on SO/IEC 27001 in place for the past two years. However, it has not monitored or measured the performance and effectiveness of its ISMS and conducted management reviews regularly Just before the recertification audit, the company decided to conduct an internal audit. It also asked most of their staff to compile the written individual reports of the past two years for their departments. This left the Production Department with less than the optimum workforce, which decreased the company's stock.
Tessa was SunDee's internal auditor. With multiple reports written by 50 different employees, the internal audit process took much longer than planned, was very inconsistent, and had no qualitative measures whatsoever Tessa concluded that SunDee must evaluate the performance of the ISMS adequately. She defined SunDee's negligence of ISMS performance evaluation as a major nonconformity, so she wrote a nonconformity report including the description of the nonconformity, the audit findings, and recommendations. Additionally, Tessa created a new plan which would enable SunDee to resolve these issues and presented it to the top management Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
What caused SunDee's workforce disruption?
- A. The inconsistency of reports written by different employees
- B. The voluminous written reports
- C. The negligence of performance evaluation and monitoring and measurement procedures
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 52
Scenario 8: SunDee is an American biopharmaceutical company, headquartered in California, the US. It specializes in developing novel human therapeutics, with a focus on cardiovascular diseases, oncology, bone health, and inflammation. The company has had an information security management system (ISMS) based on SO/IEC 27001 in place for the past two years. However, it has not monitored or measured the performance and effectiveness of its ISMS and conducted management reviews regularly Just before the recertification audit, the company decided to conduct an internal audit. It also asked most of their staff to compile the written individual reports of the past two years for their departments. This left the Production Department with less than the optimum workforce, which decreased the company's stock.
Tessa was SunDee's internal auditor. With multiple reports written by 50 different employees, the internal audit process took much longer than planned, was very inconsistent, and had no qualitative measures whatsoever Tessa concluded that SunDee must evaluate the performance of the ISMS adequately. She defined SunDee's negligence of ISMS performance evaluation as a major nonconformity, so she wrote a nonconformity report including the description of the nonconformity, the audit findings, and recommendations. Additionally, Tessa created a new plan which would enable SunDee to resolve these issues and presented it to the top management Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
What caused SunDee's workforce disruption?
- A. The negligence of performance evaluation and monitoring and measurement procedures
- B. The inconsistency of reports written by different employees
- C. The voluminous written reports
Answer: A
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2013, clause 9.1, an organization must monitor, measure, analyze and evaluate its information security performance and effectiveness. This includes determining what needs to be monitored and measured, the methods for doing so, when and by whom the monitoring and measurement shall be performed, when the results shall be analyzed and evaluated, and who shall be responsible for ensuring that the actions arising from the analysis and evaluation are taken 1.
SunDee failed to comply with this requirement and did not monitor or measure the performance and effectiveness of its ISMS for the past two years. As a result, the company did not have any objective evidence or indicators to demonstrate the achievement of its information security objectives, the effectiveness of its controls, the satisfaction of its interested parties, or the identification and treatment of its risks. This also meant that the company did not conduct regular management reviews of its ISMS, as required by clause 9.3, which would provide an opportunity for the top management to ensure the continuing suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of the ISMS, and to decide on any changes or improvements needed 1.
Just before the recertification audit, the company decided to conduct an internal audit, as required by clause 9.2, which is a systematic, independent and documented process for obtaining audit evidence and evaluating it objectively to determine the extent to which the audit criteria are fulfilled 1. However, the company did not have a well-defined audit program, scope, criteria, or methodology, and relied on the written reports of its staff for the past two years. This caused a disruption in the workforce, as most of the staff had to compile their reports for their departments, leaving the Production Department with less than the optimum workforce, which decreased the company's stock. Moreover, the internal audit process was very inconsistent, as the reports were written by different employees with different styles, formats, and levels of detail. The internal audit process also lacked any qualitative measures, such as performance indicators, metrics, or benchmarks, to evaluate the performance and effectiveness of the ISMS.
Therefore, the cause of SunDee's workforce disruption was the negligence of performance evaluation and monitoring and measurement procedures, which led to a lack of objective evidence, a poorly planned and executed internal audit, and a decrease in the company's productivity and stock value.
NEW QUESTION # 53
Based on scenario 7, what should Anna be aware of when gathering data?
- A. The collection and preservation of records
- B. The type of data that helps prevent future occurrences of information security incidents
- C. The use of the buffer zone that blocks potential attacks coming from malicious websites where data can be collected
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 54
According to scenario 10, NetworkFuse requested from the certification body to review all the documentation only on-site. Is this acceptable?
- A. No, the certification body decides whether the documentation review takes place on-site or off-site
- B. Yes, only if a confidentiality agreement is formerly signed by the audit team
- C. Yes, the auditee may request that the review of the documentation takes place on-site
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 55
According to scenario 8, Tessa created a plan for ISMS monitoring and measurement and presented it to the top management Is this acceptable?
- A. Yes, Tessa can advise the top management on improving the company's functions
- B. No, Tessa must implement all the improvements needed for issues found during the audit
- C. No, Tessa should only communicate the issues found to the top management
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 56
Scenario 7: InfoSec is a multinational corporation headquartered in Boston, MA, which provides professional electronics, gaming, and entertainment services. After facing numerous information security incidents, InfoSec has decided to establish teams and implement measures to prevent potential incidents in the future Emma, Bob. and Anna were hired as the new members of InfoSec's information security team, which consists of a security architecture team, an incident response team (IRT) and a forensics team Emma's job is to create information security plans, policies, protocols, and training to prepare InfoSec to respond to incidents effectively Emma and Bob would be full-time employees of InfoSec, whereas Anna was contracted as an external consultant.
Bob, a network expert, will deploy a screened subnet network architecture This architecture will isolate the demilitarized zone (OMZ) to which hosted public services are attached and InfoSec's publicly accessible resources from their private network Thus, InfoSec will be able to block potential attackers from causing unwanted events inside the company's network. Bob is also responsible for ensuring that a thorough evaluation of the nature of an unexpected event is conducted, including the details on how the event happened and what or whom it might affect.
Anna will create records of the data, reviews, analysis, and reports in order to keep evidence for the purpose of disciplinary and legal action, and use them to prevent future incidents. To do the workaccordingly, she should be aware of the company's information security incident management policy beforehand Among others, this policy specifies the type of records to be created, the place where they should be kept, and the format and content that specific record types should have.
Why did InfoSec establish an IRT? Refer to scenario 7.
- A. To collect, preserve, and analyze the information security incidents
- B. To comply with the ISO/IEC 27001 requirements related to incident management
- C. To assess, respond to, and learn from information security incidents
Answer: C
Explanation:
Based on his tasks, Bob is part of the incident response team (IRT) of InfoSec. According to the ISO/IEC
27001:2022 standard, an IRT is a group of individuals who are responsible for responding to information security incidents in a timely and effective manner. The IRT should have the authority, skills, and resources to perform the following activities:
* Identify and analyze information security incidents and their impact
* Contain, eradicate, and recover from information security incidents
* Communicate with relevant stakeholders and authorities
* Document and report on information security incidents and their outcomes
* Review and improve the information security incident management process and controls Bob's job is to deploy a network architecture that can prevent potential attackers from accessing InfoSec's private network, and to conduct a thorough evaluation of the nature and impact of any unexpected events that might occur. These tasks are aligned with the objectives and responsibilities of an IRT, as defined by the ISO/IEC 27001:2022 standard.
References:
* ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, Clause 10.2, Information security incident management
* ISO/IEC 27035-1:2023, Information technology - Information security incident management - Part
1: Principles of incident management
* ISO/IEC 27035-2:2023, Information technology - Information security incident management - Part
2: Guidelines to plan and prepare for incident response
* PECB, ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course, Module 10, Information security incident management
NEW QUESTION # 57
Which security controls must be implemented to comply with ISO/IEC 27001?
- A. Those listed in Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001, without any exception
- B. Those designed by the organization only
- C. Those included in the risk treatment plan
Answer: C
Explanation:
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 does not prescribe a specific set of security controls that must be implemented by all organizations. Instead, it allows organizations to select and implement the controls that are appropriate for their context, based on the results of a risk assessment and a risk treatment plan. Therisk treatment plan is a document that specifies the actions to be taken to address the identified risks, including the selection of controls from Annex A or other sources, the allocation of responsibilities, the expected outcomes, the priorities and the resources. Therefore, the security controls that must be implemented to comply with ISO/IEC 27001 are those that are included in the risk treatment plan, which may vary from one organization to another.
References:
* ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 6.1.3
* PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course, Module 5, slide 18
NEW QUESTION # 58
Which situation described in scenario 1 represents a threat to HealthGenic?
- A. HealthGenic did not train its personnel to use the software
- B. HealthGenic used a web-based medical software for storing patients' confidential information
- C. The software company modified information related to HealthGenic's patients
Answer: C
NEW QUESTION # 59
Scenario 9: OpenTech provides IT and communications services. It helps data communication enterprises and network operators become multi-service providers During an internal audit, its internal auditor, Tim, has identified nonconformities related to the monitoring procedures He identified and evaluated several system Invulnerabilities.
Tim found out that user IDs for systems and services that process sensitive information have been reused and the access control policy has not been followed After analyzing the root causes of this nonconformity, the ISMS project manager developed a list of possible actions to resolve the nonconformity. Then, the ISMS project manager analyzed the list and selected the activities that would allow the elimination of the root cause and the prevention of a similar situation in the future. These activities were included in an action plan The action plan, approved by the top management, was written as follows:
A new version of the access control policy will be established and new restrictions will be created to ensure that network access is effectively managed and monitored by the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Department The approved action plan was implemented and all actions described in the plan were documented.
Based on scenario 9. is the action plan for the identified nonconformities sufficient to eliminate the detected nonconformities?
- A. No, because the action plan does not include a timeframe for implementation
- B. No, because the action plan does not address the root cause of the identified nonconformity
- C. Yes, because a separate action plan has been created for the identified nonconformity
Answer: A
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 10.1, an action plan for nonconformities and corrective actions should include the following elements1:
What needs to be done
Who is responsible for doing it
When it will be completed
How the effectiveness of the actions will be evaluated
How the results of the actions will be documented
In scenario 9, the action plan only describes what needs to be done and who is responsible for doing it, but it does not specify when it will be completed, how the effectiveness of the actions will be evaluated, and how the results of the actions will be documented. Therefore, the action plan is not sufficient to eliminate the detected nonconformities.
Reference:
1: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, clause 10.1, Nonconformity and corrective action.
NEW QUESTION # 60
Scenario 10: NetworkFuse develops, manufactures, and sells network hardware. The company has had an operational information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001 requirements and a quality management system (QMS) based on ISO 9001 for approximately two years. Recently, it has applied for a j^ombined certification audit in order to obtain certification against ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 9001.
After selecting the certification body, NetworkFuse prepared the employees for the audit The company decided to not conduct a self-evaluation before the audit since, according to the top management, it was not necessary. In addition, it ensured the availability of documented information, including internal audit reports and management reviews, technologies in place, and the general operations of the ISMS and the QMS. However, the company requested from the certification body that the documentation could not be carried off-site However, the audit was not performed within the scheduled days because NetworkFuse rejected the audit team leader assigned and requested their replacement The company asserted that the same audit team leader issued a recommendation for certification to its main competitor, which, for the company's top management, was a potential conflict of interest. The request was not accepted by the certification body According to scenario 10, NetworkFuse requested from the certification body to review all the documentation only on-site. Is this acceptable?
- A. No, the certification body decides whether the documentation review takes place on-site or off-site
- B. Yes, only if a confidentiality agreement is formerly signed by the audit team
- C. Yes, the auditee may request that the review of the documentation takes place on-site
Answer: A
Explanation:
According to the ISO/IEC 27001:2022 standard, the certification body is responsible for planning and conducting the audit, including the review of the documented information. The certification body may decide to review the documentation on-site or off-site, depending on the audit objectives, scope, criteria, and risks. The auditee may not impose any restrictions on the access to the documentation, unless there are valid reasons for confidentiality or security. However, such restrictions should be agreed upon before the audit and should not compromise the effectiveness and impartiality of the audit.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 9.2.2
ISO/IEC 27006:2021, clause 7.1.4
NEW QUESTION # 61
An organization has justified the exclusion of control 5.18 Access rights of ISO/IEC 27001 in the Statement of Applicability (SoA) as follows: "An access control reader is already installed at the main entrance of the building." Which statement is correct'
- A. The justification is not acceptable because it does not indicate that it has been selected based on the risk assessment results
- B. The justification is not acceptable, because it does not reflect the purpose of control 5.18
- C. The justification for the exclusion of a control is not required to be included in the SoA
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 62
It is allowed that employees and contractors are provided with an anonymous reporting channel to report violations of information security policies or procedures ("whistle blowing")
- A. False
- B. True
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 63
Del&Co has decided to improve their staff-related controls to prevent incidents. Which of the following is NOT a preventive control related to the Del&Co's staff?
- A. Authentication and authorization
- B. Control of physical access to the equipment
- C. Video cameras
Answer: C
Explanation:
Explanation
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Annex A.7, the objective of human resource security is to ensure that employees and contractors understand their responsibilities and are suitable for the roles for which they are considered, and to reduce the risk of human error, theft, fraud, or misuse of facilities. The standard specifies eight controls in this domain, which are:A.7.1 Prior to employment: This control covers the screening, terms and conditions, and roles and responsibilities of employees and contractors before they are hired.A.7.2 During employment: This control covers the awareness,
education, and training, disciplinary process, and management responsibilities of employees and contractors during their employment.A.7.3 Termination and change of employment: This control covers the return of assets,
removal of access rights, and exit interviews of employees and contractors when they leave or change their roles.
The other controls in Annex A are related to other aspects of information security, such as organizational, physical, and technological controls. For example:A.9.2 User access management: This control covers the authentication and authorization of users to access information systems and services, based on their roles and responsibilities.A.11.1 Secure areas: This control covers the control of physical access to the equipment and information assets,
such as locks, alarms, guards, etc.A.13.2 Information transfer: This control covers the protection of information during its transfer, such as encryption, digital signatures, secure protocols, etc.
Therefore, video cameras are not a preventive control related to the staff, but rather a physical control related to the equipment and assets. Video cameras can be used to monitor and record the activities of the staff, but they cannot prevent them from causing incidents. They can only help to detect and investigate incidents after they occur.
References: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection - Information security management systems - Requirements, Annex A; PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course, Module 8: Implementation of Information Security Controls.
NEW QUESTION # 64
An organization that has an ISMS in place conducts management reviews at planned intervals, but does not retain documented information on the results. Is this in accordance with the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001?
- A. Yes. ISO/IEC 27001 requires organizations to document the results of management reviews only if they are conducted ad hoc
- B. Yes. ISO/IEC 27001 does not require organizations to document the results of management reviews
- C. No, ISO/IEC 27001 requires organizations to document the results of management reviews
Answer: C
Explanation:
Explanation
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 9.3.3, the organization must retain documented information as evidence of the results of management reviews. The results of management reviews must include decisions and actions related to the ISMS policy, objectives, risks, opportunities, resources, and communication.
Documenting the results of management reviews is important to ensure the accountability, traceability, and effectiveness of the ISMS. It also helps the organization to monitor and measure the performance and improvement of the ISMS, and to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001:2022.
Therefore, an organization that has an ISMS in place and conducts management reviews at planned intervals, but does not retain documented information on the results, is not in accordance with the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001. (From the PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course Manual, page 107) References:
PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course Manual, page 107
PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Info Kit, page 7
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 (en), Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection - Information security management systems - Requirements, clause 9.3.3 1
NEW QUESTION # 65
Scenario 9: OpenTech provides IT and communications services. It helps data communication enterprises and network operators become multi-service providers During an internal audit, its internal auditor, Tim, has identified nonconformities related to the monitoring procedures He identified and evaluated several system Invulnerabilities.
Tim found out that user IDs for systems and services that process sensitive information have been reused and the access control policy has not been followed After analyzing the root causes of this nonconformity, the ISMS project manager developed a list of possible actions to resolve the nonconformity. Then, the ISMS project manager analyzed the list and selected the activities that would allow the elimination of the root cause and the prevention of a similar situation in the future. These activities were included in an action plan The action plan, approved by the top management, was written as follows:
A new version of the access control policy will be established and new restrictions will be created to ensure that network access is effectively managed and monitored by the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Department The approved action plan was implemented and all actions described in the plan were documented.
Based on this scenario, answer the following question:
OpenTech has decided to establish a new version of its access control policy. What should the company do when such changes occur?
- A. Identify the change factors to be monitored
- B. Include the changes in the scope
- C. Update the information security objectives
Answer: C
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 6.2, the organization shall establish information security objectives at relevant functions and levels. The information security objectives shall be consistent with the information security policy and relevant to the information security risks. The organization shall update the information security objectives as changes occur. Therefore, when OpenTech decides to establish a new version of its access control policy, it should update its information security objectives accordingly to reflect the changes and ensure alignment with the policy.
NEW QUESTION # 66
Which of the situations below can negatively affect the internal audit process?
- A. Conducting internal audit interviews with all employees of the organization
- B. Reporting the internal audit results to the top management
- C. Restricting the internal auditor's access to offices and documentation
Answer: C
NEW QUESTION # 67
Which situation presented in scenario 8 is not in compliance with ISO/IEC 27001 requirements?
- A. Emma had access to all offices and documentation of HealthGenic
- B. The recodification audit Is planned to be conducted two years after HealthGenic implemented the ISMS
- C. Emma has an operational role in the HealthGenic's management system
Answer: C
NEW QUESTION # 68
Scenario 3: Socket Inc is a telecommunications company offering mainly wireless products and services. It uses MongoDB. a document model database that offers high availability, scalability, and flexibility.
Last month, Socket Inc. reported an information security incident. A group of hackers compromised its MongoDB database, because the database administrators did not change its default settings, leaving it without a password and publicly accessible.
Fortunately. Socket Inc. performed regular information backups in their MongoDB database, so no information was lost during the incident. In addition, a syslog server allowed Socket Inc. to centralize all logs in one server. The company found out that no persistent backdoor was placed and that the attack was not initiated from an employee inside the company by reviewing the event logs that record user faults and exceptions.
To prevent similar incidents in the future, Socket Inc. decided to use an access control system that grants access to authorized personnel only. The company also implemented a control in order to define and implement rules for the effective use of cryptography, including cryptographic key management, to protect the database from unauthorized access The implementation was based on all relevant agreements, legislation, and regulations, and the information classification scheme. To improve security and reduce the administrative efforts, network segregation using VPNs was proposed.
Lastly, Socket Inc. implemented a new system to maintain, collect, and analyze information related to information security threats, and integrate information security into project management.
Based on scenario 3, what would help Socket Inc. address similar information security incidents in the future?
- A. Using cryptographic keys to protect the database from unauthorized access
- B. Using the MongoDB database with the default settings
- C. Using the access control system to ensure that only authorized personnel is granted access
Answer: A
Explanation:
In Scenario 3, the measure that would help Socket Inc. address similar information security incidents in the future is "B. Using cryptographic keys to protect the database from unauthorized access." Implementing cryptographic controls, including cryptographic key management, is a proactive measure to secure the data in the MongoDB database against unauthorized access. It ensures that even if attackers gain access to the database, they cannot read or misuse the data without the appropriate cryptographic keys. This approach aligns with best practices for securing sensitive data and is part of a comprehensive security strategy.
Reference:
ISO 27001 - Annex A.10 - Cryptography
ISO 27001 Annex A.10 - Cryptography | ISMS.online
ISO 27001 cryptographic controls policy | What needs to be included?
NEW QUESTION # 69
......
Get 2024 Updated Free PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Exam Questions and Answer: https://www.testkingpass.com/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer-testking-dumps.html
ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Dumps PDF and Test Engine Exam Questions: https://drive.google.com/open?id=146UCWskF_9pOzB3WxisJT-QbxghbN13a